Technology and Changing Political Dynamics

               It has always been routine of the int’l politics that there is always a flux and abrupt change in it. Some become heroes and others go down. Few new terminologies are being tossed up, some loopholes are being detected. The whole world has the same topic of discussion, every tongue is flowing the same words.
                In the old ages there was no such ease of access to the world’s political circumstances. It should take months for news to spread across the world. Till it should spread the matter should have gotten settled down. But even after taking this much time more than half of world’s population should not be aware of this news. People used to live their lives in such a way as if every day is normal.
                Print media was probably the first source that rectified the news system. Events and new happenings got to spread in a faster way. Years were reduced to a time frame of Months and months were reduced to days. But this was not that effective way as required. Not all the people were having access to it nor it was so elaborate to get a clear image/idea of the happening. Moreover, it was not live; a lot of new happening should have taken place until you read the previous/obsolete one.
                So, the world needed a better way. People were in need of such a way through which they can get better awareness of the world’s happenings every moment.
                Radio was introduced to overcome this problem. Though radio of that time was that advanced as of today. Its signals were initially available at every location if you missed to listen something properly it would result in fabrication of story/news. So, in the meanwhile the print media had got very popular.
So, people started using both print and electronic media for globalizing the world. These were both used simultaneously time b/c they were no replication for each other.
Public wanted to access the changing circumstances in live and visual way. Both the previous Medias were either lacking visual or live. This was quite a bit more necessary because to access the world happenings. You can’t get actual awareness of the event until and unless you watch it carefully.
So, the Television was introduced to fulfill this need of the society. It really revolutionized the world. It was publicized a lot. Access was easy. You could both watch, listen simultaneously. The live coverage was also introduced, where you could get aware of the current happenings at the time even when it is happening. Later on, talk shows, analysis and interviews were also introduced through which public could watch and listen to the  views of analysts and experts, leaders and iconic personalities and analyze the current political circumstances and have a deep idea and learning of it   but with this and of electronic media  conspiracy theories also started going famous. This gone biased and people started to expose every fake and scam through some other channels. 
Social media got popular for exposition of a lot of matters and happenings. Likewise, Wikileaks exposed a lot of realities that no electronic media could expose. Similarly, Mark Snowden has also revealed a lot of realities using the World Wide Web.  In March 2016, Wikileaks
have revealed an archive of about 50,000 emails of Hillary Clinton. The case of Panama leaks has got popularity through this source of news. Everyday millions of people across the world use to discuss the same issue. People share a lot of facts, visuals, past history and much more about current happenings.
But this media has a lot of fabrications and scams in news. Fake news may get popular within seconds.


Conclusion: We should take advantage of every technology but will always inquire for the reality.


Contact Us

Name

Email *

Message *